| 61 | 0 | 145 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的 评估规范化培训对提升临床输血病历质量的效果,分析影响病历质量的关键因素,并提出相应的改进建议。方法 对贵州中医药大学第二附属医院2017年1月至2023年12月的临床输血病历进行季度抽样评价。每季度随机抽取30份左右输血病历,依据《临床用血工作病历质量检查评分细则》进行评分(总分100分:≥90分为甲级,80~89分为乙级,<80分为丙级)。自2018年起,每年针对临床科室开展不少于2次的输血病历规范化培训,并持续进行质量改进。研究采用质量评分细则分析输血病历质量和采用卡方检验统计分析2017年以后甲级率的差异。结果 共分析854份输血病历,年度分布:2017年127份(14.87%)、2018年123份(14.40%)、2019年130份(15.22%)、2020年117份(13.70%)、2021年116份(13.58%)、2022年125份(14.64%)、2023年116份(13.58%)。各年度甲级率分别为53.54%、68.29%、67.69%、77.78%、71.55%、72.80%、76.72%。与2017年相比,经卡方检验后续各年甲级率均显著提高(P<0.05)。输血病历主要质量问题包括输血前免疫检查漏缺(2017—2023年分别为21.26%、11.38%、4.62%、11.97%、6.90%、6.40%、8.62%)和输血病程记录漏缺或不完整(分别为30.71%、21.14%、20.77%、19.66%、23.28%、18.10%)。外科系统的平均甲级率(21.42%)低于内科系统(48.34%)。结论 规范化的培训能有效提升临床输血病历质量,对保障临床安全用血具有重要意义。
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effect of standardized training on improving the quality of clinical blood transfusion records, analyze the key factors affecting record quality, and propose corresponding improvement suggestions. Method Quarterly sampling evaluation of clinical blood transfusion records from January 2017 to December 2023 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Approximately 30 blood transfusion records were randomly selected each quarter and scored according to the "Quality Inspection Scoring Criteria for Clinical Blood Use Records"(total score 100, and ≥90 points for Grade A, 80-89 points for Grade B, <80 points for Grade C). Since 2018, standardized training for blood transfusion recordshad been conducted at least twice a year for clinical departments, with continuous quality improvement. The study was analyzed the quality of blood transfusion records using quality scoring criteria and employs chi-square test statistical analysis to assess the differences in the grade A rate after 2017. Result A total of 854 blood transfusion records were analyzed, with annual distribution that 127 records in 2017(14.87%), 123 in 2018(14.40%), 130 in 2019(15.22%), 117 in 2020(13.70%), 116 in 2021(13.58%), 125 in 2022(14.64%), and 116 in 2023(13.58%). The Grade A rates for each year were 53.54%, 68.29%,67.69%, 77.78%, 71.55%, 72.80%, 76.72%, respectively. Compared to 2017, the Grade A rates in subsequent years significantly increased after chi-square testing(P<0.05). The main quality issues in blood transfusion records were included missing pre-transfusion immunologicalchecks that 21.26%, 11.38%, 4.62%, 11.97%, 6.90%, 6.40%, 8.62% from 2017 to 2023 and incomplete or missing transfusion course records that 30.71%, 21.14%, 20.77%, 19.66%, 23.28%, 18.10%. The average Grade A rate in the surgical system(21.42%) was lower than that in the internal medicine system(48.34%). Conclusion Standardized training can effectively improve the quality of clinical blood transfusion records, which is of great significance for ensuring he safe use of blood in clinical practice.
[1] 张莉莉,李明穗.惠州市医疗机构临床用血规范化管理调查与分析[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2020,30(22):186-187.
[2] 王波.输血医学文书规范化管理的思考[J].检验医学与临床,2020,17(12):1776-1778.
[3] 梁军兵,姚亚萍,许亚亚,等.应用PDCA四步法在输血病历管理中的效果及评价[J].中国输血杂志.2013,26(5):476-477.
[4] 马敏,陈全兵.基于规范临床输血病历管理对提高输血病历质量影响[J].中西医结合心血管病电子杂志,2020,8(21):194.
[5] 蒋钱,尹明伟,陈学军,等.临床输血病历质量考核评价体系优化提升[J].中国输血杂志,2023,36(11):1035-1039.
[6] 夏敏,王淼,陈莉,等.上海市儿童医院2017—2019年输血督查分析[J].中国输血杂志,2020,33(7):691-694.
[7] Sapiano MRP,Jones JM,Savinkina AA,et al.Supplemental findings of the 2017 national blood collection and utilization survey[J].Transfusion,2020,60(2):S17-S37.
[8] Kathuria I,Mandal S,Negi S,et al.An audit to estimate the quality of practices followed during bedside blood transfusion in a tertiary care hospital and role of continuous medical education in it[J].Transfus Clin Biol,2022,29(3):209-212.
[9] Ray GK,Mukherjee S,Routray SS,et al.Knowledge,attitudes and practices of resident doctors and interns on safe blood transfusion practices:a survey-based study[J].Hematol Transfus Cell Ther,2023,45(3):342-349.
[10] Harvey AR,Basavaraju SV,Chung KW,et al.Transfusion-related adverse reactions reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network Hemovigilance Module,United States,2010 to 2012[J].Transfusion,2015,55(4):709-718.
[11] Hendrickson JE,Roubinian NH,Chowdhury D,et al.Incidence of transfusion reactions:a multicenter study utilizing systematic active surveillance and expert adjudication[J].Transfusion,2016,56(10):2587-2596.
[12] 于永敬,汤毅楠,张媛,等.病历质控系统在输血病历中的应用[J].基础医学与临床,2021,41(10):1554-1558.
[13] Xu GP,Wu LF,Xu XM,et al.Information technology improves the quality of transfusion practice in China[J].Vox Sang,2023,118(2):138-146.
基本信息:
中图分类号:R197.323
引用信息:
[1]温丽娜,宋婷,郑丹,等.基于规范化培训的输血病历质量提升研究[J].贵州医药,2025,49(10):1532-1535.
基金信息:
贵州中医药大学—大学生创新创业训练计划项目[贵中医大创合字(2022)96号;贵中医大创合字(2022)70号]
2025-10-21
2025-10-21